The Influence Of Compensation And Work Environment On Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction As An Intervening Variable
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v3i1.457Keywords:
Compensation, Work Environment, Job Satisfaction, Employee PerformanceAbstract
This research aims to analyze the influence of compensation and work environment on employee performance both directly and indirectly through job satisfaction as an intervening variable. This research uses quantitative research using an explanatory research approach. Where the sample in this research was 46 employees at UD. New Jaya Sakti who were taken using saturated sampling. This research has seven hypotheses and where are the seven hypotheses. The results of the simultaneous test show that compensation and work environment influence job satisfaction. Then compensation, work environment and job satisfaction influence employee performance. The results of the hypothesis test also show that there are five paths that have a significant effect, namely compensation on employee performance of 0.449 with a significance value of 0.000, compensation on job satisfaction of 0.476 with a significance of 0.000, job satisfaction on employee performance of 0.274 with a significance value of 0.023, work environment on Job satisfaction is 0.565 with a significance value of 0.000. The work environment on employee performance is 0.529 with a significance value of 0.000. This research also proves two indirect paths showing the effect of compensation on employee performance through job satisfaction of 0.130 and the work environment on employee performance through job satisfaction of 0.154.
Downloads
References
H. T. Yi, Y. Cho, and F. E. Amenuvor, “Internal marketing and salespeople’s out-of-role behaviour: The mediating role of job satisfaction,” Eur. Res. Manag. Bus. Econ., vol. 29, no. 2, p. 100216, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.iedeen.2023.100216.
L. Stirpe, S. Profili, and A. Sammarra, “Satisfaction with HR practices and employee performance: A moderated mediation model of engagement and health,” Eur. Manag. J., vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 295–305, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.emj.2021.06.003.
D. Gary, Human Resources Management, Nine. Jakarta: Gramedia Group, 2017.
I. Gil, G. Berenguer, and A. Cervera, “The roles of service encounters, service value, and job satisfaction in achieving customer satisfaction in business relationships,” Ind. Mark. Manag., vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 921–939, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2007.06.008.
M. A. Al-Hawari, S. Quratulain, and S. B. Melhem, “How and when frontline employees’ environmental values influence their green creativity? Examining the role of perceived work meaningfulness and green HRM practices,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 310, no. May, p. 127598, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127598.
J. H. Jung, T. J. Brown, and A. R. Zablah, “How Customer Requests Influence Frontline Employee Job Outcomes: The Role of Personal Appraisal Tendencies and Situational Customer Demandingness,” J. Retail., vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 315–334, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2021.03.005.
D. Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan. 2013.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
