Analysis of Appraisal Category in 2013 Curriculum and Merdeka Curriculum

Authors

  • Sofi Yunianti Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya
  • Idhoofiyatul Fatin 1Universitas Muhammadiyah Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v2i2.257

Keywords:

Merdeka curriculum, 2013 curriculum, appraisal theory, Engagement, Graduation

Abstract

This study employed to analyses on a comparison between the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum using the Appraisal theory. It concentrates on 12th grade in Curriculum 2013 and phase E in Merdeka Curriculum due to the last level of high-class grade. The total amount of the data is 37 sentences. Furthermore, the data is categorized based on appraisal devices and the next step is deciding the appraisal categories and subcategories. The results illustrate that in 2013 curriculum, it tends to deliver to reader how the quality of learning outputs. Meanwhile, in Merdeka, it gives emphasize on the quantity. It means that it delivers to the reader various skill that can be achieved.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baderiah. (2018). Buku Ajar Pengembangan Kurikulum. Lembaga Penerbit Kampus IAIN Palopo.

Baharuddin, M. R. (2021). Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM Program Studi). Jurnal Studi Guru Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.591

Byrnes, H. (2009). Systemic-functional reflections on instructed foreign language acquisition as meaning-making: An introduction. Linguistics and Education, 20(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.002

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Pearson.

Dhani, R. R. (2020). Peran Guru dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum. Jurnal Serunai Administrasi Pendidikan, 9(1), 45–50. https://ejournal.stkipbudidaya.ac.id/index.php/jc/article/view/251/170

Erlistiana, D., Nawangsih, N., Aziz, F. A., Yulianti, S., & Setiawan, F. (2022). Penerapan Kurikulum dalam Menghadapi Perkembangan Zaman di Jawa Tengah. Ál-Fâhim: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 1–15. 10.54396/alfahim.v4i1.235

Fatin, I. (2017). Keterbacaan Buku Teks Bahasa Indonesia Kelas X Kurikulum 2013 Edisi Revisi 2016 dengan Formula Fry. Jurnal Belajar Bahasa, 2(1), 21–33. http://jurnal.unmuhjember.ac.id/index.php/BB/article/ see/643/517

Fatmawati, I. (2021). Peran Guru dalam Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Revorma, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran, 1(1), 20–37. https://ejournal-revorma.sch.id/index.php/mansa/article/view/4/5

Fontaine, L. (2013). Analyzing English Grammar: a Systemic Functional Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Hood, S. (2010). Appraising research: Evaluation in academic writing. Palgrave Macmillan.

Hood, S. (2019). Appraisal. In The Cambridge Handbook of Systemic Functional Linguistics (pp. 382–409). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316337936.004

Jullian, P. M. (2011). Appraising through someone else’s words: The evaluative power of quotations in news reports. Discourse and Society, 22(6), 766–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926511411697

Macken-Horarik, M. & Isaac, A. (2014). Evaluation in Context. In G. T. & L. Alba-Juez (Ed.), Appraising Appraisal. The Netherlands: John Benjamins.

Manshur, R., Suwandi, S., & Suyitno. (2018). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Revisi 2016 Pada Pembelajaran Menulis Teks Anekdot. Indonesian Language Education and Literature, 4(1), 22–35. 10.24235/ileal.v4i1.1982

Mantra, I. B. N., Pramerta, I. G. P. A., Arsana, A. A. P., Puspadewi, K. R., & Wedasuwari, I. A. M. (2022). Persepsi Guru Terhadap Pentingnya Pelatihan Pengembangan dan Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(5), 6313–6318. https://stp-mataram.e-journal.id/JIP/article/view/2073/1617

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2007). Working with discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. Continuum.

Masykur, R. (2019). Teori Dan Telaah Pengembangan Kurikulum. AURA.

McKinley, J. (2018). Integrating appraisal theory with possible selves in understanding university EFL writing. System, 78, 27–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.07.002

Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka untuk Pemulihan Krisis Pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 251–262. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JIK

Putra, I. G. S., Renda, N. T., & Rati, N. W. (2022). Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Spiritual dan Sikap Sosial Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar Tema Indahnya Keberagaman di Negeriku. Jurnal Pedagogi Dan Pembelajaran, 5(2), 241–249. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JP2/article/download/46833/23515/141991

Ramadhan, A. H., Fadillah, H., Khaliza, R., & Nasution, I. (2022). Penerapan Kurikulum Darurat sebagai Strategi Pendidikan dalam Kondisi Pandemic Covid-19. Edumaspul - Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 401–407. https:/ /ummaspul.e-journal.id/maspuljr/article/view/2383/943

Setiawati, F. (2022). Dampak Kebijakan Perubahan Kurikulum terhadap Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Nizamul ‘Ilmi: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam (JMPI), 7(1), 1–17. https://ejournal.staisyamsululum.ac.id/index.php/nizamulilmi/article/view/124

Starfield, S., Paltridge, B., McMurtrie, R., Holbrook, A., Bourke, S., Fairbairn, H., Kiley, M., & Lovat, T. (2015). Understanding the language of evaluation in examiners’ reports on doctoral theses. Linguistics and Education, 31, 130–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2015.06.004

Troyan, F. J. (2021). “Alors, on va faire une activité”: An SFL perspective on student engagement in contextualized world language instruction. System, 98, 102483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102483

W, S. (2022). Pengembangan Kurikulum (Sebagai Peran Guru Profesional). Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(3), 3752–3760. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i3.2645

Wibowo, I. S., & Farnisa, R. (2018). Hubungan Peran Guru Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Gentala Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.22437/gentala.v3i2.6758.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-31