Dual Missions in Ecotourism Management

(Case Study of Agro Tourism Management of PTPN XII Rengganis Gunung Gambir Sum-berbaru Jember)

Authors

  • Asmuni Asmuni Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Pembangunan Jember
  • Denis Irawan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Pembangunan Jember
  • Muhammad Dandi Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Pembangunan Jember
  • Wahyu Indah Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Pembangunan Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v1i2.196

Keywords:

Ecotourism, Business alternative, Empowerment

Abstract

This study examines the management of ecotourism as a business that has a dual mission. Alternative business management that balances a business-heavy orientation with its social goals. Basically, this ecotourism is not the core business but only a complementary business to the business-heavy of tea plantation. Even though ecotourism is a complementary business, it is able to provide a relatively stable business income and is profitable every year. On the other hand, this ecotourism business is more capable of providing social impacts for many communities. This study uses a qualitative method; conduct in-depth interviews and field observations, field observations and examine secondary data on the tourist destination of Gunung Gambir Jember Agrotourism. The findings of this study found that ecotourism is able to become a business alternative as independent form core business and tends to be profitable. This ecotourism business has a different market segment from its core business. This ecotourism business is able to absorb labor better, separate of labor plantation. The involvement of community groups both directly and indirectly in this business cycle shows that the empowerment model is happening and continues to run. It concludes that the management of ecotourism tourism by involving community groups around plantations to some extent is a business model that is not only profit-oriented. But this business model accommodates many people involved and is not abandoned.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. F. Backman dan I. Munanura, “Introduction to the special issues on ecotourism in Africa over the past 30 years,” J. Ecotourism, vol. 14, no. 2–3, hal. 95–98, 2015, doi: 10.1080/14724049.2015.1128058.

S. Gössling, “Sustainable Tourism Development in Developing Countries : Some Aspects of Energy Use,” J. Sustain., no. September 2012, hal. 37–41, 2010.

A. Ebrahim, J. Battilana, dan J. Mair, “The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations,” Res. Organ. Behav., vol. 34, hal. 81–100, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.riob.2014.09.001.

J. G. Dees dan B. Anderson, “‘Framing a theory of social entrepreneurship: building on two schools of practice and thought’, Research on Social Entrepreneurship,” ARNOVA Occas. Pap. Ser., vol. 1, no. 3, hal. 39–66, 2006, [Daring]. Tersedia pada: https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.arnova.org/resource/resmgr/Publications/ARNOVA_Research_on_Social_En.pdf.

R. L. Martin dan S. Osberg, “Social Enterpreneurship: The Case for Definition,” Angew. Chemie - Int. Ed., hal. 28–39, 2007, doi: 10.1002/anie.201310158.

S. A. Zahra, E. Gedajlovic, D. O. Neubaum, dan J. M. Shulman, “A typology of social entre-preneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 24, no. 5, hal. 519–532, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007.

R. Spear, “Religion and social entrepreneurship,” in Values and Opportunities in Social En-trepreneurship, 2010, hal. 31–51.

G. Chatzichristos dan N. Nagopoulos, “Social entrepreneurs as institutional entrepreneurs: evidence from a comparative case study,” Soc. Enterp. J., vol. 17, no. 4, hal. 566–583, 2021, doi: 10.1108/SEJ-12-2020-0137.

V. Kushardianti Muzha, H. Ribawanto, dan M. Hadi, “Pengembangan Agrowisata Dengan Pendekatan Community Based Tourism,” J. Adm. Publik, vol. 1, no. 3, hal. 135–141, 2013.

I. P. D. Swastika, M. K. Sri Budhi, dan M. H. Urmila Dewi, “Analisis Pengembangan Agrowisata Untuk Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Di Kecamatan Petang, Kabupaten Badung,” E-Jurnal Ekon. dan Bisnis Univ. Udayana, vol. 12, hal. 4103, 2017, doi: 10.24843/eeb.2017.v06.i12.p03.

Y. Kristiana dan S. Theodora M, “Strategi Upaya Pengembangan Pariwisata Berkelanjutan Agrowisata Berbasis Masyarakat Kampung Domba Terpadu Juhut, Provinsi Banten,” J. Ilm. Widya, vol. 3, no. 3, hal. 1–7, 2016.

Y. Kristiana dan T. C Nathalia, “PERAN PEMANGKU KEPENTINGAN SEBAGAI UPAYA PENGEMBANGAN PARIWISATA DI KABUPATEN BIAK NUMFOR,” Pari-wisata Pesona, vol. 04, no. 1, hal. 1–10, 2019.

J. Moleong, Lexy, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif., Edisi 5. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya., 2016.

Sugiyono., Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, R dan D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012.

W. A. Lestari, “9 Potret Memesona Agrowisata Kebun Teh Gunung Gambir Jember,” ttps://www.idntimes.com, 2021. https://www.idntimes.com/travel/destination/windy-lestari/agrowisata-kebun-teh-gunung-gambir-jember-c1c2.

Y. Ardhi, “In Picture: Wisata Agrorengganis Kebun Teh Gunung Gambir,” https://republika.co.id, 2021.

Https://getlost.id, “Menikmati Sejuknya Kebun Teh Gunung Gambir di Jember,” 2021. https://getlost.id/2021/10/14/menikmati-sejuknya-kebun-teh-gunung-gambir-di-jember/.

Asmuni, Rohim, dan A. Trihartono, “Minimizing brain drain: How BumDes holds the best resources in the villages,” vol. 485, no. 1, hal. 1–7, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/485/1/012011.

Narasumber,Utama, “Transkip wawancara,” 2022.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-20