GRI Standars Based Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Toward Market Reaction In Energy Companies Listed in Indonesia Stock Exchange

Authors

  • Astrid Maharani Maharani Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
  • Yusron Rozzaid Rozzaid Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32528/issh.v1i1.19

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, stock returns, event studies, energy

Abstract

This study aims to analyze of the implementation Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) disclosure on market reaction to energy companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This is based on environmental issues that are growing, especially in energy companies in Indonesia, the development of previous research, and the effective implementation of the Global Reporting Initiative that uses the 2016 GRI standard which was approved in 2016 by the Global Sustainability Standards Board (GASB). The way to measure CSR disclosure is by using GRI-based CSR index 2016 while the market reaction is measured by using Cumulative Abnormal Return (CAR). This research focuses on energy companies that are growing rapidly in Indonesia. In addition, that energy companies are companies that fall into the category of companies high-profile.companies High-profile are companies which were highlighted by the public for the actions on the environment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Hari, “Evaluasi, 10 Tahun Kasus Lapindo,” Harian Kompas, Sidoarjo, Jun. 2016.

GRI, “GRI 101: Fundamental 2016,” Gssb, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 30, 2016.

A. Chariri, F. A. Nugroho, F. Ekonomi, and U. Diponegoro, “RETORIKA DALAM PELAPORAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY : ANALISIS SEMIOTIK ATAS SUSTAINABILITY REPORTING,” no. 5, pp. 0–23, 2009.

C. W. Astuti and Y. W. Nugrahanti, “Pengaruh Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Reaksi Pasar,” Din. Akuntansi, Keuangan, dan Perbank., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 90–105, 2015.

B. Ismainingtyas, B. Suryono, and W. Wahidahwati, “Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pengungkapan Corporate Social Responsibility,” Wahana J. Ekon. Manaj. dan Akunt., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2020, doi: 10.35591/wahana.v23i1.183.

R. W. Roberts, “Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: An application of stakeholder theory,” Accounting, Organ. Soc., vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 595–612, 1992, doi: 10.1016/0361-3682(92)90015-K.

D. Zuhroh and I. P. P. H. Sukmawati, “Analisis Pengaruh Luas Pengungkapan Sosial dalam Laporan Tahunan Perusahaan terhadap Reaksi Investor,” J. dan Pros. Simp. Nas. Akunt., vol. 6, 2003.

D. Hackston and M. J. Milne, “Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies,” Accounting, Audit. Account. J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 77–108, 1996, doi: 10.1108/09513579610109987.

R. M. Haniffa and T. E. Cooke, “The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting,” J. Account. Public Policy, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 391–430, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001.

C. Flammer, “Corporate social responsibility and shareholder reaction: The environmental awareness of investors,” Acad. Manag. J., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 758–781, 2013, doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.0744.

T. Y. Yen and P. André, “Market reaction to the effect of corporate social responsibility on mergers and acquisitions: Evidence on emerging markets,” Q. Rev. Econ. Financ., vol. 71, pp. 114–131, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.qref.2018.07.003.

N. Fifianti and - Prasetyono, “Determinant of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure,” J. Audit. Financ. Forensic Account., vol. 7, no. 1, p. InPress, 2019, doi: 10.21107/jaffa.v7i1.6184.

J. Hartono, Teori Portofolio dan Analisis Investasi, Ke 9. Yogyakarta: BPEF Yogyakarta, 2014.

B. Lev, “On the Usefulness of Earnings and Earnings Research: Lessons and Directions from Two Decades of Empirical Research,” J. Account. Res., vol. 27, pp. 153–192, 1989.

D. Junaedi, “Dampak Tingkat Pengungkapan Informasi Perusahaan Terhadap Volume Perdagangan Dan Return Saham: Penelitian Empiris Terhadap Perusahaan-Perusahaan Yang Tercatat Di Bursa Efek Jakarta,” J. Akunt. dan Keuang. Indones., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 1–28, 2005, doi: 10.21002/jaki.2005.08.

R. E. Freeman, “Response : Divergent Stakeholder Theory Author ( s ): R . Edward Freeman Source : The Academy of Management Review , Vol . 24 , No . 2 ( Apr ., 1999 ), pp . 233-236 Published by : Academy of Management Stable URL : http://www.jstor.org/stable/259078 REFER,” vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 233–236, 2017.

Downloads

Published

2022-01-31