Scientrometric Analysis Cognitive Biases Modification in Accounting Information Systems Research
Keywords:
Decision-Making, Cognitive Biases in AIS, Scientometric AnalysisAbstract
Recently, AIS researchers have begun to study cognitive bias, a topic that has been studied in psychologist-minded behavior of using the system. This has led to an unusual collection of papers with conflicting ideas, methodologies, and language. Our scientometric study provides the first comprehensive overview of AIS cognitive bias research. Through a systematic literature scan of the top 15 AIS sources over a 20-year period, we identified 102 papers related to cognitive bias. Our content analysis further revealed a significant increase in interest in cognitive bias research in AIS disciplines over the time period studied. However, there is an uneven distribution of this research across different AIS domains and industry settings. Although AIS has benefited from the study of perception and decision biases, there is still untapped potential in studying social biases, memory, and interest. Our work highlights gaps in AIS-related bias research and the need for more consistent bias identification and measurement practices. We are committed to conducting further research to promote the growth of cumulative knowledge in this area
Downloads
References
Borgman, C. L., & Furner, J. (2002). Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 36, 2–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440360102
Buele, I., & Guerra, T. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of Scientific Production on Tax Evasion in Sciencedirect, Years 2010 To 2019. Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 24(2), 1–15.
Chen, C. (2017). Science Mapping: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Chen, C., & Song, M. (2019). Visualizing a field of research: A methodology of systematic scien-tometric reviews. PLoS ONE, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223994
Ding, X., & Yang, Z. (2020). Knowledge mapping of platform research: a visual analysis using VOSviewer and CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research, 22(3), 787–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-020-09410-7
Effah, N. A. A., Asiedu, M., & Otchere, O. A. S. (2022). Improvements or deteriorations? A bibliometric analysis of corporate governance and disclosure research (1990–2020). Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/jbsed-10-2021-0142
Fulop, R. (2022). The influence of fiscal regulations on transfer pricing: a bibliometric review. Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research, 15(1), 35–57. https://doi.org/10.24193/rvm.2022.15.84
Henderson, C., Huerta, E., & Glandon, T. A. (2015). Standardizing the presentation of financial data: Does XBRL’s taxonomy affect the investment performance of nonprofessional investors? International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 15(September), 127–153. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v15_5
Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Lim, W. M., Chatterjee, A. N., & Pandey, N. (2021). What do we know about transfer pricing? Insights from bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 134(May), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.041
Probowulan, D. (2023, January). Website government program: behavior intention accounting student based on the UTAUT model. In Proceeding International Conference on Accounting and Finance (pp. 103-116).
Rusydiana, A. S. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of journals, authors, and topics related to COVID-19 and Islamic finance listed in the Dimensions database by Biblioshiny. Science Editing, 8(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.232
Syarifuddin, S. (2016). Konsep Pembentukan Keputusan dalam Akuisisi Sistem Informasi Akuntansi: Sebuah Perspektif Teori Schemata. AKMEN Jurnal Ilmiah, 767–776. http://e-jurnal.stienobel-indonesia.ac.id/index.php/akmen/article/view/224
Taqi, M., Rusydiana, A. S., Kustiningsih, N., & Firmansyah, I. (2021). Environmental accounting: A scientometric using biblioshiny. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 11(3), 369–380. https://doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.10986
Thelwall, M., & Sud, P. (2022). Scopus 1900–2020: Growth in articles, abstracts, countries, fields, and journals. Quantitative Science Studies, 3(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00177
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of infor-mation technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
Wang, H., Xiong, W., Xiong, W., Wu, G., Wu, G., Zhu, D., & Zhu, D. (2018). Public–private partnership in Public Administration discipline: a literature review. Public Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1313445
Zhang, J., Wang, Q., Xia, Y., & Furuya, K. (2022). Knowledge Map of Spatial Planning and Sus-tainable Development: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace. Land, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11030331
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
